| Species diversity patterns of free-living marine nematodes in the
        Aegean SeaNikolaos Lampadariou 
        
        Institute of Marine Biology of Crete, 
        
        P.O. Box 2214 710 03 Heraklion, 
        
        Crete, Greece
          
            Deep-sea nematode from the Aegean Sea|  |  Nematodes are the most numerous multicellular animals on earth
        inhabiting almost every possible environment. A handful of soil will
        contain thousands of the microscopic worms, many of them parasites of
        insects, plants or animals. Free-living marine forms are also very
        abundant, including nematodes that feed on bacteria, fungi, and other
        nematodes, yet the vast majority of species encountered are poorly
        understood biologically.  Today, we can only speculate how many species of nematodes exist. For
        example, there are estimates that they constitute up to 80% (Bongers,
        1988) or 90% (Jairajpuri & Ahmad, 1992) of all metazoan on earth.
        More recently, Lambshead (1993) estimated the number of nematode species
        in the deep sea to as high as 1x108. It becomes evident that
        if these estimations are pragmatic, then, we only know a tiny fraction
        of this rich and successfully resistant to environmental degradation
        taxon. Consequently, our interest lies more in what we can learn from
        the nature itself since nematodes will probably be one of the last
        groups that will disappear from the planet. Over the last few years, the Institute of Marine Biology of Crete
        (IMBC) has undertaken several studies on the diversity of free-living
        marine nematodes in the eastern Mediterranean, thus fostering a better
        understanding of local and regional biodiversity patterns. 
          
            Fig. 1. Rarefraction curves for the different
            zones of the Aegean Sea.|  |  There is a long tradition in marine ecology to separate the
        environment in different zones where certain assemblages occur, which
        are different from those occurring in other zones. The benthic
        environment is usually separated in zones according to two different
        criteria, depth and latitude.  In the following analysis of diversity, the collected samples were
        separated in six different zones: 1) littoral zone of the south
        Aegean (LS), 2) upper sublittoral zone of the south Aegean (USS),
        3) lower sublittoral zone of the south Aegean (LSS), 4)
        bathyal zone of the south Aegean (BS), 5) lower sublittoral zone
        of the north Aegean (LSN), and 6) bathyal zone of the north Aegean
        (BN).  Data from the littoral and the upper sublittoral zone of the north
        Aegean do not exist. In marine terminology, littoral is the tidal zone.
        In areas such as the Mediterranean, where tides are practically
        non-existent, the limits of the littoral zone correspond to the upper
        and lower level of the swash zone. The sublittoral zone extends from the
        lower watermark to 200 m depth whilst the bathyal zone extends from 200
        m to 2,000 m. Deeper, the abyssal zone (2,000 to 6,000 m) and the hadal
        zone (> 6,000 m) occur. However, these two zones do not exist in the
        Aegean Sea.  In the analysis that follows, the sublittoral zone was further
        separated in two sub-zones, the upper sublittoral (from the lower water
        mark to 5 m depth) and the lower sublittoral (from 5 to 200 m depth). In
        the Aegean, the upper sublittoral zone is generally considered as a
        high-energy zone, in terms of water movements, whereas the lower
        sublittoral is considered as a low-energy zone. The analysis of nematode diversity in the Aegean Sea showed that
        there was a definite bathymetric pattern, which was not linear. The
        rarefaction curves (Sanders, 1968) for each zone are presented in Fig.
        1. There is a gradual increase of diversity as depth increases. The
        littoral zone (0 metres) shows the lowest diversity, whereas the highest
        diversity values were found at the bathyal zone (200-2,000 m).  
          
            Fig. 2. Mean x standard errors for some
            diversity indices for each zone.|  |  Apart from the rarefaction curves, several other diversity indices
        were calculated, both weighted for species richness and equitability. A
        similar pattern of increasing diversity with depth is derived by these
        indices (Fig. 2). These results were further supported by ANOVA, which
        demonstrated that these differences were highly significant. Nonlinear patterns of diversity have been found in several studies.
        For example, Rex (1983) and Paterson et al. (1995), found
        parabolic distribution patterns of macrobenthic diversity with pick
        values near the bathyal zone in the Pacific and the Atlantic
        respectively. Similarly, Boucher & Lambshead (1995), combining data
        from the literature and Dinet & Vivier (1979), analysing data from
        the Atlantic found parabolic diversity patterns for marine nematodes. It appears, however, that macrofauna in the Aegean Sea does not
        follow the above trend. As have been shown by Tselepides (1992) and
        Karakassis & Eleftheriou (1997), the macrofauna diversity decreases
        with depth, something they attributed to the decrease of food
        availability with depth. Therefore, it appears that in the Aegean the
        two benthic components show an inverse diversity response to
        depth.  It would be very interesting to examine whether the observed increase
        of nematode diversity in the Aegean follows the general parabolic
        pattern found by others. The IMBC has recently started collecting
        samples from several sites of the eastern Mediterranean around the 3,500
        isobath, since the abyssal and hadal zones are absent from the Aegean
        Sea. These samples are currently being analysed in order to test whether
        the nematode diversity starts to decline after the bathyal zone.
        Nevertheless, abyssal depth is the limit that can be reached for the
        Mediterranean since no hadal environment exists in the entire basin. BibliographyBongers, T. (1988). De Nematoden Van Nederland
        Koninkliijke Nederlandse. Natuurhistorische Vereniging, Utrecht. Boucher, G. & Lambshead, P.J.D. (1995).
        Ecological biodiversity of marine nematodes in samples from temperate,
        tropical and deep sea regions. Conservation Biology 9, 1594-1604. Dinet, A. and M. H. Vivier (1979). Le meiobenthos
        abyssal du golfe de Gascogne. II. Les peuplemets de nematodes et leur
        diversite specifique. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 20: 109-123. Jairajpuri, M.S. & Ahmad, W. (1992).
        Dorylaimida. Free-living predaceous and plant-parasitic nematodes.
        Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi. Karakassis, I. & Eleftheriou, A. (1997). The
        continental shelf of Crete: structure of macrobenthic communities. Marine
        Ecology Progress Series 160, 185-196. Lambshead, P.J.D. (1993). Recent developments in
        marine benthic biodiversity research. Oceanis 19, 5-24. Paterson, G.L.J., Lambshead, P.J.D. & Gage,
        J.D. (1995). Bathymetric patterns of polychaete diversity in the Rockall
        Trough, north-east Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research 42, 1199-1214. Rex, M.A. (1983). Geographic patterns of species
        diversity in deep-sea benthos. In: G. T. Rowe Biology of the Pacific
        Ocean depths. (pp. 453-472). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sanders, H.L. (1968). Marine benthic diversity: a
        comparative study. American Naturalist 102, 243-282. Tselepides, A. (1992). Ecological study of the
        bathyal ecosystem of the Aegean Sea. PhD Thesis, Biology Department,
        University of Crete, Heraklion.
        
        
        
         |